Based on your research of other companies, clearly outline the qualifications of a strong ethical leader

Posted on | by EssayClue Team

Based on your research of other companies, clearly outline the qualifications of a strong ethical leader

Option #2: Improving Ethical Leadership The company you work for is newly dedicated to improving ethical leadership within the organization. You have been assigned the role of creating a written proposal to accomplish this goals. You must research at least three other organizations with strong ethical leadership. Using your research, address the following in your written proposal: Define ethical leadership. Based on your research of other companies, clearly outline the qualifications of a strong ethical leader. Provide examples of how the companies you researched promote and foster strong ethical leadership. How can you use these examples as an outline for an ethical leadership program within your company? Explain your proposed program. Examine the relationship between law and ethics and explain how ethical leadership influences each of them. Your well-crafted 4-5 page paper must include six references, with at least four scholarly/peer-reviewed discovered through the CSU-Global library. You may use the readings in the module; however, you must include two additional sources. Follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA. Review the grading rubric for this assignment, to understand exactly how you will be graded. Contact your instructor if you have questions about the assignment. Rubric ORG429 Mod 6 CT ORG429 Mod 6 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 10.0 pts Limited Evidence The paper or PowerPoint includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper or PowerPoint includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation The paper or PowerPoint includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >0 pts Below Expectation The paper or PowerPoint includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 20.0 to >18.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources reference key concepts from the module with in-text citations to support answers. 18.0 to >16.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 16.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 15.0 to >14.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 14.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation 12.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 15.0 pts Total Points: 75.0