Explain how the code of ethics can be communicated both internally and externally and what needs to be done to enforce it

Explain how the code of ethics can be communicated both internally and externally and what needs to be done to enforce it

Option #2: Code of Ethics As a newly hired leader of a fledgling upstart, your first task is to develop a Code of Ethics. In manual format, create a Code of Ethics and include the following: Identify the name of the organization, the size of the organization, and the purpose of the organization. Using the information above, prepare the Code of Ethics. Be sure to justify and explain each component. Explain how the code of ethics can be communicated both internally and externally and what needs to be done to enforce it. Your well-crafted 4-5 page paper must include six references, with at least four scholarly/peer-reviewed discovered through the CSU-Global library. You may use the readings in the module; however, you must include two additional sources. Follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Review the grading rubric for this assignment, to understand exactly how you will be graded. Contact your instructor if you have questions about the assignment. Rubric ORG429 Mod 5 CT ORG429 Mod 5 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper or PowerPoint includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation The paper or PowerPoint includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation The paper or PowerPoint includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The paper or PowerPoint includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources reference key concepts from the module with in-text citations to support answers. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 10.0 to >9.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given 9.0 to >8.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Cites and integrates two to three credible sources as specified in description. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are lessā€than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts Total Points: 75.0