Internal Factor Evaluation & Internal–External Matrix Scenario: You are the Director of Strategic Planning for a large hospital

Posted on | by EssayClue Team

Internal Factor Evaluation & Internal–External Matrix Scenario: You are the Director of Strategic Planning for a large hospital

CHOOSE ONLY 1 OF THE 2 OPTIONS!!!!! Option #1: Internal Factor Evaluation & Internal–External Matrix Scenario: You are the Director of Strategic Planning for a large hospital. In three weeks, the senior leadership team will embark on its annual strategic planning cycle. The CEO has decided that the team needs a “refresher course” on two important topics: Internal Factor Evaluation and Internal–External Matrix. Therefore, she has asked you to develop a one-page flyer that compares each in a side-by-side format, and invites the team to the course. The flyer should briefly describe each tool, and bullet the following items: Application of the tool, strengths of the tools, limitations of the tools, and challenges an organization may face in using the tools. The flyer should be well-written and meet the following requirements: 1 page in length (excluding title and reference pages), Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.), and In an addendum, include at least three current references from peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles. Some resources with information about developing flyers: Ten Design Tips for Professional Flyers (Links to an external site.) How to Design an Awesome Flyer Even if You’re Not a Graphic Designer (Links to an external site.) How to Design Flyers (Links to an external site.) Option #2: Educational Flyer: Grand Strategy Matrix and SPACE Matrix Scenario: You are the Director of Strategic Planning for a large hospital. In three weeks, the senior leadership team will embark on its annual strategic planning cycle. The CEO has decided that the team needs a “refresher course” on two important topics: Grand Strategy Matrix and the SPACE Matrix. Therefore, she has asked you to develop a one-page flyer that compares each in a side-by-side format, and invites the team to the course. The flyer should briefly describe each tool, and bullet the following items: Application of the tool, strengths of the tools, limitations of the tools, and challenges an organization may face in using the tools. The flyer should be well-written and meet the following requirements: 1 page in length (excluding title and reference pages), Formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.), and In an addendum, include at least three current references from peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles. Some resources with information about developing flyers: Ten Design Tips for Professional Flyers (Links to an external site.) How to Design an Awesome Flyer Even if You’re Not a Graphic Designer (Links to an external site.) How to Design Flyers (Links to an external site.) Rubric HCM481 Mod 5 CT HCM481 Mod 5 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts Total Points: 75.0