Identification of health care, risks, genetic risks, and other red flags missing

Identification of health care, risks, genetic risks, and other red flags missing

Discussion Rubric
Does Not Meet
Expectations (0
points)
Nearly Meets
Expectations (1
point)
Meets
Expectations (2
points)
Exceeds
Expectations (3
points)
Relevance
of Post
Posts topics that do
not relate to
discussion content;
makes irrelevant
remarks; responses
contain some
misinformation and/or
inaccurate thinking
related to the case.
Occasionally
posts off topic;
most posts offer
further insight into
the topic;
responses
demonstrate
limited knowledge
of content and no
critical thinking
related to the
case.
Posts are related
to the discussion
topic; posts
make some
connections with
readings;
responses show
knowledge of
content but
limited critical
thinking to the
case.
Posts are
consistently
related to the
discussion topic;
posts bring
readings into
discussion, cite
required texts
appropriately, and
demonstrate
significant critical
thinking related to
the question or
case.
References
and Support
Includes no
references or
supporting
evidence.
Uses personal
experience but no
references to
readings or
research.
Incorporates a
reference from
literature and a
personal
experience.
Uses at least
two references
to literature,
readings, or
personal
experience to
support
comments.
Expression
Within the
Post
Does not express
opinions or ideas
clearly; no
connection to topic.
Unclear
connection to
topic evidenced
in minimal
expression of
opinions or
ideas.
Opinions and ideas
are stated clearly
with occasional
lack of connection
to topic.
Expresses
opinions and
ideas in a clear
and concise
manner with
obvious
connection to
topic.
Response to
Classmates
Did not respond to
at least two
classmates.
Response does not
relate to the discussion
question, nor is it
accurate or relevant.
Information not
Responded to at
least two
classmates, but
responses do not
relate to the
discussion
question, nor are
they accurate or
relevant.
Responded to one
classmate.
Response relates to
the discussion
question and is
accurate and
relevant.
Information
substantiated by a
Responded to at
least two
classmates.
Responses relate to
the discussion
question, are
accurate and
relevant, and
present information
8
substantiated by a
reputable reference/
resource.
Information not
substantiated by a
reputable
reference/
resource.
reputable reference/
resource.
that is substantiated
by a reputable
reference/ resource.
Mechanics Utilizes poor spelling
and grammar in posts;
posts appear “hasty.”
Does not follow APA
guidelines or format.
Errors in spelling
and grammar
evidenced in posts.
Some errors om
APA citations or
paper format.
Few grammatical or
spelling errors are
noted in posts.
Closely follows APA
guidelines and
format with only
minor errors.
Consistently uses
grammatically
correct posts with
rare misspellings.
Adheres to all APA
guidelines, format,
and requirements if
needed.
Total Total Points Possible: 15
Assignment 2.1: Genogram Rubric
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Nearly Meets
Expectations
Meets Expectations
Genogram (0–6 points)
Errors present in the
four-generation
genogram developed.
(7–8 points)
Slight errors present in
the four-generation
genogram developed.
(9 points)
Four-generation
genogram properly
developed without
errors.
Content
(0–2 points)
Identification of health
care, risks, genetic
risks, and other red
flags missing.
(3 points)
Most health care, risks,
genetic risks, and other
red flags identified.
(4 points)
All health care, risks,
genetic risks, and other
red flags properly
identified.
Mechanics
(0 points)
Significant errors in
spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation that
detract from the clarity
of communication.
(1 point)
Some errors in spelling,
grammar, and/or
punctuation are present
that may detract from
the clarity of
communication.
(2 points)
No or very few spelling,
grammar, and/or
punctuation errors.
Total
Total Points Possible: 15