|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 80.00% |
3 Satisfactory 88.00% |
4 Good 92.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
70.0 %Content |
|
5.0 %Summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied |
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is either missing or not evident to the reader. |
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. |
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is presented but is disjointed. The research cited is outdated. |
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is thoroughly presented and includes all necessary elements. Some research cited in is outdated. |
A summary of the problem including the potential middle-range theory that could be applied is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes all necessary elements. |
5.0 %Description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem |
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is either missing or not evident to the reader. |
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. |
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. The research cited in the definition is outdated. |
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is thoroughly presented and includes all necessary elements. Some research cited in the definition is outdated. |
A description of a borrowed theory that could be applied to the problem is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes all necessary elements. |
15.0 %A history of the borrowed theory’s origins |
A history of the borrowed theory’s origins is either missing or not evident to the reader. |
A history of the borrowed theory’s origins is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. |
A history of the borrowed theory’s origins is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated. |
A history of the borrowed theory’s origins is present and thorough. The description is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. |
A history of the borrowed theory’s origins is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research. |
15.0 %Discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied |
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is either missing or not evident to the reader. |
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. |
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated. |
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present and thorough. The description is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. |
A discussion of how the borrowed theory has been previously applied is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research. |
15.0 %Discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem |
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is either missing or not evident to the reader. |
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present, but incomplete or illogical. |
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated. |
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present and thorough. The description is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. |
A discussion of the application of the borrowed theory to the identified problem is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research. |
15.0 %Discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory |
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is either missing or not evident to the reader. |
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is present, but incomplete or illogical. |
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is present, but cursory. The research used for support is outdated. |
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. |
A discussion of the integration of the borrowed theory and the middle-range theory is present, thorough, and well-detailed. The description is well supported with current and/or seminal research. |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |