Assignment 1Read these two non-academic links describing the science behind imp.
Assignment 1
Read these two non-academic links describing the science behind implicit association:
· How does implicit bias influence behavior? (Links to an external site.)
(https://www.verywellmind.com/implicit-bias-overview-4178401)
· Is implicit bias a useful scientific concept? (Links to an external site.)
( https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/learning-work/201805/do-i-really-have-be-actively-open-minded )
Then, access Harvard University’s Project Implicit (Links to an external site.)
(https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html)
Other than the Presidents implicit association test, select any two implicit association tests to take. After completing each, take screen grabs of the results and attach them as an appendix at the end of the reflections paper.
Compare/contrast your results in the two tests you chose. Did the results surprise you? Do your implicit associations match your conscious feelings? Reflect on how these results can be of use to you.
Write a 2-3 page paper relating your understanding of the meaning of implicit bias and reflecting on the results of your implicit bias tests.
In Week 7, you will revisit these same tests to compare/contrast the results.
Rubric
SOC 304 Week 1 Implicit Reflection Paper
SOC 304 Week 1 Implicit Reflection Paper
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplicit Association
Demonstration of your understanding of the concept
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Student develops a critical understanding of implicit association by going beyond the two non-academic sources listed to access and incorporate academic sources
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Good
Student demonstrates adequate understanding of the concept of implicit association
14.0 to >13.0 pts
Developing
13.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Student demonstrates minimal understanding of the concept
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
Frank self-reflection on the results of the implicit association tests and how they correlate and/or differ with student’s conscious beliefs
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Insightful reflection of the test results and how they correlate and/or differ with student’s conscious beliefs.
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Good
Limited reflection of the test results and their relationship to student’s conscious beliefs
14.0 to >13.0 pts
Developing
13.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Vague or evasive reflection of implicit association results
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing
Spelling, Grammar, and overall MUGS errors
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
NO MUGS errors!
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Good
No more than 2-3 MUGS errors.
14.0 to >13.0 pts
Developing
13.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 4 MUGS errors.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Virtually perfect APA formatting, with no more than minor punctuation errors
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Good
No more than 2-3 minor APA errors, but no reference requirements are omitted
14.0 to >13.0 pts
Developing
13.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Multiple APA errors, which may include missing reference requirements
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIncludes Screen Grabs of test results
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Includes screen grabs of both tests
18.0 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
16.0 to >14.0 pts
Good
Includes screen grab of 1 test
14.0 to >13.0 pts
Developing
13.0 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not include screen grabs
20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Assignment 2
During this course, you will keep a journal reflecting on your thoughts about the topic we explore each week. Please use the prompts to guide your reflection.
· Complete the Employable Skills Self-Efficacy Survey for Psychology Majors and score each domain.
· Which domains indicate your strongest employable skills (highest scores)? In what ways were you surprised by these scores?
· How have you developed these strengths throughout your courses in your psychology program? Give an example to illustrate your answer.
· Which domains indicate your weakest employable skills (lowest scores)? Explain why these scores seem accurate or inaccurate?
· Given the results of this survey, what is your plan to develop your weaker skills? How are these skills relevant to your potential career path?
Journal is due by Sunday at 11:59pm.
Rubric
PSY 324 Reflection Essay Rubric
PSY 324 Reflection Essay Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparation of reflection essay
25.0 to >23.0 pts
STRONG Reflection Essay shows evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.
23.0 to >20.0 pts
PROFICIENT. Reflection essay shows some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has some knowledge to share.
20.0 to >18.0 pts
DEVELOPING. Reflection essay shows little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
18.0 to >0 pts
BEGINNING. Reflection Essay shows no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of content
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Reflection essay contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) completely.
23.0 to >20.0 pts
Reflection essay contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Reflection essay contains minimal information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).
18.0 to >0 pts
Reflection essay contains almost no information for reader. The entry does not address the focus question(s).
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal reflection
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Reflection essay conveys extensive evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author’s growth through reflection on learning.
23.0 to >20.0 pts
Reflection essay conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author is capable of reflecting on learning.
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Reflection essay conveys little evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s).
18.0 to >0 pts
Reflection essay shows no personal response to the focus question(s).
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions
25.0 to >23.0 pts
Reflection essay shows few, if any errors in standard written English that do not interfered with understanding.
23.0 to >20.0 pts
Reflection essay may have some errors in standard written English that rarely interfere with understanding.
20.0 to >18.0 pts
Reflection essay has several kinds of errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.
18.0 to >0 pts
Reflection essay has frequent and severe errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.
25.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
The post Assignment 1
Read these two non-academic links describing the science behind imp appeared first on nursing writers.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
Assignment 1Read these two non-academic links describing the science behind imp
Get FAST homework help. Place a similar order and get a 15% Discount for your first three orders. We have a team of professional tutors to help you with any assignment regardless of the deadline. Contact us for immediate Homework Help.
