Aids In Africa

The goal of this essay is to analyze a report on AIDS in Africa and explain the views of different pharmaceutical companies concerning the distribution of various antiretroviral drugs. Hopefully, it will help us identify the main reason behind the high prevalence rates of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Ricardo credited with the theory of comparative advantage probably, would have encouraged the pharmaceutical companies to produce drugs they were well suited for in surplus. Consequently, they would sell surplus drugs to the developing countries at subsidized prices in exchange of cheaper raw materials and better governmental policies. Locke on the other hand, would have supported the companies arguing that the prices were determined by the supply-demand chain. Another sociologist Smith, would have criticized the companies for trying to monopolize the market via the TRIPS agreement so as to fix higher prices for the drugs. Lastly, Marx would have encouraged the companies to come up with prices based on the labor used from research to processing.

The positions of GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol- Myers Squibb lie behind Locke’s view on property while Cipla’s position lies behind Marx’s view on property. Apparently, Cipla is the only group according to the article, which holds the correct view on property. This is because the drug companies could not continue realizing huge profit margins at the expense of poor Africans who succumbed to the deadly virus. Thanks to Cipla, they had to subsidize the price of their drug regimens to ensure poor Africans also had access to the drugs.

In terms of utilitarianism, I believe Cipla’s position generated more happiness and had more moral worth compared to GlaxoSmithKline’s position. Moreover, Cipla was justified and showed more caring for the Africans unlike GlaxoSmithKline who were guided by their own selfish interests. Though, GlaxoSmithKline had the ultimate right to determine the prices of their commodities because the drugs were a product of their research and hard work and Cipla had no right at all to copy their regimens. Ethically, I believe Cipla’s position was more correct because it took into account the lives of poor Africans.

Our decisions should not be guided by our selfish interests. Instead, we should weigh the possible outcomes of our decisions and make the correct choice.

References

Martin Cohen (2008): Philosophical Tales. Blackwell Publishers.

McLellan, David (2007): Marxism After Marx. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

EssayClue Team

Get FAST homework help. Place a similar order and get a 15% Discount for your first three orders. We have a team of professional tutors to help you with any assignment regardless of the deadline. Contact us for immediate Homework Help.

Aids In Africa

The goal of this essay is to analyze a report on AIDS in Africa and explain the views of different pharmaceutical companies concerning the distribution of various antiretroviral drugs. Hopefully, it will help us identify the main reason behind the high prevalence rates of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Ricardo credited with the theory of comparative advantage probably, would have encouraged the pharmaceutical companies to produce drugs they were well suited for in surplus. Consequently, they would sell surplus drugs to the developing countries at subsidized prices in exchange of cheaper raw materials and better governmental policies. Locke on the other hand, would have supported the companies arguing that the prices were determined by the supply-demand chain. Another sociologist Smith, would have criticized the companies for trying to monopolize the market via the TRIPS agreement so as to fix higher prices for the drugs. Lastly, Marx would have encouraged the companies to come up with prices based on the labor used from research to processing.

The positions of GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol- Myers Squibb lie behind Locke’s view on property while Cipla’s position lies behind Marx’s view on property. Apparently, Cipla is the only group according to the article, which holds the correct view on property. This is because the drug companies could not continue realizing huge profit margins at the expense of poor Africans who succumbed to the deadly virus. Thanks to Cipla, they had to subsidize the price of their drug regimens to ensure poor Africans also had access to the drugs.

In terms of utilitarianism, I believe Cipla’s position generated more happiness and had more moral worth compared to GlaxoSmithKline’s position. Moreover, Cipla was justified and showed more caring for the Africans unlike GlaxoSmithKline who were guided by their own selfish interests. Though, GlaxoSmithKline had the ultimate right to determine the prices of their commodities because the drugs were a product of their research and hard work and Cipla had no right at all to copy their regimens. Ethically, I believe Cipla’s position was more correct because it took into account the lives of poor Africans.

Our decisions should not be guided by our selfish interests. Instead, we should weigh the possible outcomes of our decisions and make the correct choice.

References

Martin Cohen (2008): Philosophical Tales. Blackwell Publishers.

McLellan, David (2007): Marxism After Marx. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

EssayClue Team

Get FAST homework help. Place a similar order and get a 15% Discount for your first three orders. We have a team of professional tutors to help you with any assignment regardless of the deadline. Contact us for immediate Homework Help.