Discuss what it takes to be an effective leader

Posted on | by EssayClue Team

Discuss what it takes to be an effective leader

Discuss what it takes to be an effective leader. Incorporate the questions below in your answer. Reflecting on Newtonian vs. Quantum characteristics described in Porter-O’Grady and Malloch’s quantum Leadership, and the crucial accountability methods that lead to getting the desired results, what leadership style most closely reflects you? Do you think this is the most effective for your work setting? Why? What communication devices do you use to maximize team involvement in the execution of organizational objectives? Your initial posting should be 250 to 350 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbook This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score Content of Initial Thread/Post Weight: 40% 0 points Response contains little to none of the required aspects of the prompt; Content is off topic; references are not included. APA reference/citation format is not used. 5.6 points Major required aspects of the prompt are not addressed or the response speaks in vague generalities. Information is too general; 1 reference is present, but it is non-scholarly (if required) and/or it does not appropriately reflect the topic. APA reference/citation format may be inaccurate in the response. 6.4 points Response addresses prompt requirements. Content is relevant and germane to the intent of the prompt; 1 or more references are scholarly (if required) and/or appropriately reflect topic, and have few APA formatting errors. 8 points Content includes additional or novel points beyond the intent of the prompt. References are sufficient, scholarly in nature, and are formatted correctly in APA format. / 8 Critical Thinking of Thread/Post Weight: 10% 0 points Little analysis or insight is displayed; Little or no logical support or reasoning is present 1.4 points Some illogical statements and poor reasoning displayed; argument is unclear or convoluted 1.6 points Response indicates that thought, insight, and analysis has taken place; Argument is solid and logical 2 points Response is rich in critical thinking, and full of thought, insight, and analysis; Argument is clear and concise / 2 Quality of Written Communication in Initial Thread/Post Weight: 20% 0 points Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. 2.8 points Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 3.2 points Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 4 points Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. / 4 Discussion Responses to Classmates’ Threads/Posts Weight: 30% 0 points Did not make an effort to participate in learning community as it develops; Displays lack of engagement with discussion forum; Did not make the minimum of 2 responses to classmates. 4.2 points Occasionally makes meaningful reflection on group’s efforts; Marginal effort to become involved with group; Made one response to classmates 4.8 points Frequently attempts to direct the discussion and present relevant viewpoints for consideration by group; Interacts freely; Met the minimum of 2 responses to classmates 6 points Shows astute awareness of needs of community; Frequently attempts to motivate the group discussion; Presents creative approaches to topic; Made at least 2 responses to classmates